Where is the Safe Harbor: Is Rule 37(e) Living Up to Low Expectations?
In the debates leading up to the 2006 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, much controversy was stirred by the proposal to add a “safe harbor” from spoliation sanctions. The version of the safe harbor that was enacted in what is now Rule 37(e) bears little resemblance to what was originally offered for public comment; continued reference to the rule as a “safe harbor” is more often than not sarcastic. Given the gaping caveats that characterize the rule, its adoption was met with widespread skepticism and an apparent consensus that litigants should not expect the “safe harbor” to provide much protection in the event of a spoliation storm.
Posted by Adam I. Cohen at 1:01 PM - Categories: safe harbor | Spoilation
