{"id":1062,"date":"2021-10-25T16:03:35","date_gmt":"2021-10-25T20:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/aclr-online\/volume-53\/the-fourth-amendment-in-the-twenty-first-century-smartphones\/"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:09:29","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:09:29","slug":"the-fourth-amendment-in-the-twenty-first-century-smartphones","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/aclr-online\/volume-53\/the-fourth-amendment-in-the-twenty-first-century-smartphones\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century: Smartphones"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Commonwealth v. Doleras, the Supreme Judicial Court of\u00a0Massachusetts upheld a warranted search of a defendant\u2019s iPhone photo\u00a0library and found that the warrant affidavit showed probable cause to\u00a0justify searching the entire phone. The court, in validating the search\u00a0warrant, set a narrow scope for Massachusetts\u2019 Fourth Amendment\u00a0protections against unreasonable searches of smartphones. The court\u2019s\u00a0decision also highlights the challenge U.S. courts face in defining the\u00a0bounds of the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and\u00a0seizure as applied to increasingly sophisticated technology.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/2023\/02\/53-0-Singh-Fourth-Amendment-in-21st-Century.pdf\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Commonwealth v. Doleras, the Supreme Judicial Court of\u00a0Massachusetts upheld a warranted search of a defendant\u2019s iPhone photo\u00a0library and found that the warrant affidavit showed probable cause to\u00a0justify searching the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4766,"featured_media":0,"parent":1030,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-1062","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4766"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1062"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1726,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1062\/revisions\/1726"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1030"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}