In its recent opinion in Commonwealth v. Warren<\/i>, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court stated that when a black male flees from a Field Interrogation Operation (\u201cFIO\u201d), such flight \u201cis not necessarily probative of a suspect\u2019s state of mind or consciousness of guilt.\u201d The court found that because men of color are frequent subjects of racial profiling, when a man of color flees from the police, it may not necessarily be because he is guilty of an underlying criminal offense. This is true, the court said, even when the individual\u2019s physical characteristics closely, though \u201cvague[ly],\u201d match those of a wanted suspect-at-large.<\/p>\n
In Warren<\/i>, the defendant, a black male, was the target of a FIO because he matched the description of a suspect of a reported breaking-and-entering in Boston\u2019s Roxbury neighborhood (he, like the alleged suspect, was wearing a \u201cred hoodie\u201d). When the police approached the defendant and ordered him to stop, he ran, \u201cclutching the right side of his pants, a motion [the police officer] described as consistent with carrying a gun without a holster.\u201d The police officer later apprehended the defendant in the backyard of a residential property. The officer did not recover any contraband from the defendant\u2019s person; however, minutes after \u201carrest[ing]\u201d the defendant, police officers recovered a handgun nearby on the property. Because the defendant did not have a valid license to carry a firearm, he was taken into custody.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Warren <\/i>decision comes at a time when the sociopolitical context vis-\u00e0-vis race relations in the United States is in a challenging state. Notions of color-blindness (itself a problematic term) and living in a \u201cpost-racial\u201d society dominate mainstream political and academic discourse. Yet, it is difficult to ignore the implications of such strained race relations on communities of color, particularly when discussing the interactions between such communities and the officers who police them. Indeed, there is substantial evidence indicating that communities of color, which are often most in need of greater police protections, are in fact disproportionately victims of lethal police force. While several (often discordant) theories exist, speculating the cause of such grave abuse of power, the uncontrivable and overwhelming demand for social change can no longer be ignored. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Absent an effective legislative response at the federal level, several grassroots movements have emerged in recent years, calling upon the criminal justice system to effect meaningful change in policing communities of color. While marginalized communities of color are subjected to police force, the Massachusetts court\u2019s opinion suggests a shift away from decades-long precedent that has traditionally granted law enforcement broad discretion in search and seizure. The court\u2019s approach in Commonwealth v. Warren <\/i>is a welcome recognition of the extent to which an individual\u2019s race plays a role in determining whether a police officer will subject him to a seizure. This piece discusses the extent to which this decision may expand an individual\u2019s privacy rights vis-\u00e0-vis conduct that permits police officers to execute a lawful search or seizure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n