{"id":596,"date":"2020-03-29T15:51:59","date_gmt":"2020-03-29T19:51:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/?page_id=596"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:09:36","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:09:36","slug":"haymonds-riddles-supervised-release-the-jury-trial-right-and-the-governments-path-forward","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/in-print\/volume-57-number-2-spring-2020\/haymonds-riddles-supervised-release-the-jury-trial-right-and-the-governments-path-forward\/","title":{"rendered":"Haymond&#8217;s Riddles: Supervised Release, the Jury Trial Right, and the Government&#8217;s Path Forward"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p2\">In <em><span class=\"s2\">United States v. Haymond<\/span><\/em>, the Supreme Court found one piece of the federal supervised release system to be unconstitutional. This Article discusses three issues that are unresolved in <em><span class=\"s2\">Haymond<\/span><\/em>\u2019s wake. First, it examines whether applying the <em><span class=\"s2\">Apprendi <\/span><\/em>line of cases to the main supervised release system would disrupt that system, concluding that it would not. Second, it considers what the proper remedy should be for the constitutional infirmity identified in <em><span class=\"s2\">Haymond<\/span><\/em>, finding that the provision in question must be struck down due to a previously unexplored double jeopardy issue. Lastly, this Article argues that legislatures can largely achieve the same outcome as the provision at issue in <em><span class=\"s2\">Haymond <\/span><\/em>by allowing defendants\u2014in exchange for receiving shorter prison sentences\u2014to prospectively waive their jury trial rights for supervised release revocations.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/15\/2020\/03\/57-2-haymonds-riddles-supervised-release-the-jury-trial-right-and-the-governments-path-forward.pdf\">Keep Reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In United States v. Haymond, the Supreme Court found one piece of the federal supervised release system to be unconstitutional. This Article discusses three issues that are unresolved in Haymond\u2019s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":989,"featured_media":0,"parent":1295,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-596","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/989"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":597,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596\/revisions\/597"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1295"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/american-criminal-law-review\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}