{"id":252,"date":"2018-12-05T12:06:37","date_gmt":"2018-12-05T17:06:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/?page_id=252"},"modified":"2026-05-07T13:45:24","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T17:45:24","slug":"thomas-m-cooley-book-prize-symposium","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/chase-lecture-and-colloquium\/thomas-m-cooley-book-prize-symposium\/","title":{"rendered":"Cooley Book Prize, Judicial Lecture &amp; Symposium"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Cooley Book Prize, Judicial Lecture and Symposium honors the renowned legal scholar and jurist Thomas McIntyre Cooley. Cooley was a longstanding chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, and a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, where he also served as the dean. He authored several highly influential books, including <em>A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2>2025 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><em>To Trust the People with Arms: the Supreme Court and the Second Amendment<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/\">Georgetown Center for the Constitution<\/a> is pleased to announce that <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Robert J. Cottrol, Professor of Law at The George Washington University Law School, and Brannon P. Denning, Associate Dean and Professor of Law at Samford University\u2019s Cumberland School of Law, have been awarded the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/news\/georgetown-center-for-the-constitution-awards-cooley-book-prize-to-law-professors-robert-j-cottrol-l84-of-george-washington-university-and-brannon-p-denning-of-samford-university\/\">2025 Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize<\/a> of $50,000 for their book, \u201c<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/kansaspress.ku.edu\/9780700635719\/\"><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To Trust the People with Arms: The Supreme Court and the Second Amendment<\/span><\/i><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201d (University Press of Kansas, 2023).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Professor Randy Barnett<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, Faculty Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution, praised the selection:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cWhile other scholarship, including my own, has focused on the original meaning of the Second Amendment, this book traces the treatment given that amendment from the founding until today by Congress and state legislatures, by state and federal courts, and eventually by the U.S. Supreme Court. Cottrol and Denning situate their\u00a0 narrative in the political movements for gun control that arose in the 20th century in response to gang violence in the 1920s and to the explosion of street crime in the 1960s. I learned a ton from reading this book.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On May 22nd, 2025, Professors Cottrol and Denning will receive the Cooley Prize at an award ceremony at the National Archives.<\/p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\"  id=\"_ytid_34749\"  width=\"480\" height=\"270\"  data-origwidth=\"480\" data-origheight=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/g3dXwon7NJM?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&cc_lang_pref=&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&rel=1&fs=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&controls=1&disablekb=0&\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__  no-lazyload\" title=\"YouTube player\"  allow=\"fullscreen; accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen data-no-lazy=\"1\" data-skipgform_ajax_framebjll=\"\"><\/iframe>\n<h2>2024 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><i>Memory and Authority: the Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation<\/i><\/h3>\n<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/\">Georgetown Center for the Constitution<\/a>\u00a0is pleased to announce that Jack M. Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School, has been awarded the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/news\/georgetown-center-for-the-constitution-awards-cooley-book-prize-to-yale-law-schools-jack-m-balkin\/\">Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize<\/a>\u00a0of $50,000 for his book\u00a0<em>Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation<\/em> (Princeton University Press, 2023).<\/p>\n<p>The Center\u2019s faculty director, Georgetown Law Professor\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Randy Barnett<\/a>, explained the Cooley Book Prize decision:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Memory and Authority is a major contribution to the current debate about the proper uses of history in interpreting and applying the original meaning of our written Constitution, as well as in constitutional discourse generally. Jack Balkin\u2019s explication of what he calls \u2018framework originalism\u2019 has long defied the common misperception that originalism is just for political conservatives.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On October 18th, 2024, Jack Balkin will receive the Cooley Prize at an award ceremony at the National Archives.<\/p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\"  id=\"_ytid_61243\"  width=\"480\" height=\"270\"  data-origwidth=\"480\" data-origheight=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/qAh5XXLUVvk?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&cc_lang_pref=&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&rel=1&fs=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&controls=1&disablekb=0&\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__  no-lazyload\" title=\"YouTube player\"  allow=\"fullscreen; accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen data-no-lazy=\"1\" data-skipgform_ajax_framebjll=\"\"><\/iframe>\n<h2>2023 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><i>Salmon P. Chase: Lincoln&#8217;s Vital Rival<\/i><\/h3>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/news\/georgetown-center-for-the-constitution-awards-50000-cooley-book-prize-to-walter-stahr-biographer-of-chief-justice-salmon-p-chase\/#:~:text=WASHINGTON%20%E2%80%93%20The%20Georgetown%20Center%20for,of%20figures%20from%20American%20history.\">sixth annual<\/a> Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize of $50,000 was awarded to Walter Stahr for his book, <em>Salmon P. Chase: Lincoln&#8217;s Vital Rival\u00a0<\/em>(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2022). Walter Stahr is a lawyer and the author, to date, of four biographies of figures from American history.<\/p>\n<p>The Center\u2019s faculty director, Patrick Hotung Professor of Constitutional Law\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Randy Barnett<\/a>, explained its Cooley Book Prize decision:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Reviving the memory of neglected figures who played an important role in our constitutional history is at the core of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution\u2019s mission. To this end, we named our very first high-profile event the Salmon P. Chase Distinguished Lecture and Faculty Colloquium. Awarding both the Cooley Prize and the Chase Lectureship to the same person is unprecedented. It is fitting that, on the tenth anniversary of the Chase lecture series, we honor Walter Stahr for his masterful book. Thanks to him, at long last, Salmon Chase has the biography he deserves.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On Friday, September 29, 2023, Walter Stahr will receive the Cooley Prize at an award ceremony at the National Archives. The evening event will feature the Thomas M. Cooley Judicial Lecture by the Honorable Stephanos Bibas of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.\u00a0<b><\/b><\/p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\"  id=\"_ytid_24325\"  width=\"480\" height=\"270\"  data-origwidth=\"480\" data-origheight=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/GLVLgSMpfGg?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&cc_lang_pref=&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&rel=1&fs=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&controls=1&disablekb=0&\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__  no-lazyload\" title=\"YouTube player\"  allow=\"fullscreen; accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen data-no-lazy=\"1\" data-skipgform_ajax_framebjll=\"\"><\/iframe>\n<h2>2022 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><i>The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power Under the Constitution<\/i><\/h3>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/news\/georgetown-center-for-the-constitution-awards-fifth-cooley-book-prize-to-stanfords-michael-mcconnell\/#:~:text=Cooley%20Book%20Prize%20of%20%2450%2C000,Princeton%20University%20Press%2C%202020).\">fifth annual<\/a> Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize of $50,000 was awarded to Professor Michael W. McConnell of Stanford University for his book, <em>The President Who Would Not Be King: Executive Power Under the Constitution<\/em>\u00a0(Princeton University Press, 2020).<\/p>\n<p>The Center\u2019s faculty director, Georgetown Law Professor\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Randy Barnett<\/a>, explained the Cooley Book Prize decision:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>The Center\u2019s mission is to advance Originalism as an interpretive method by developing originalist theory and promoting superb originalist scholarship. Michael McConnell richly deserves this recognition for his pioneering work as an originalist scholar, the pinnacle of which is his masterful book, The President Who Would Not Be King.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Identifying the original meaning of the executive power has proven to be a challenge for originalists. Does the letter of Article II limit the executive power to the specific powers enumerated in Article II the way Congress\u2019 powers are limited by Article I? Does the president have powers that are inherently \u201cexecutive\u201d in nature in addition to those specified in Article II? When may presidential powers be limited by Congress? Was the spirit of Article II primarily informed by the need to avoid a monarchy like that of England or to empower an energetic executive?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Michael McConnell brilliantly shows how the Philadelphia Convention threaded the needle of creating a strong unitary executive while allocating significant powers to Congress to constrain their abuse. In particular, he sensitively examines each of the \u201cprerogative\u201d powers of the British monarch and shows how the framers carefully considered which to allocate to an elected president, which to the Senate, and which to the Congress as a whole.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>His pathbreaking analysis of the successive drafts of the Constitution demonstrates the care that was taken to empower an effective executive while avoiding the emergence of a king. Using this originalist interpretation, he then powerfully critiques the tri-partite framework for evaluating executive power in Justice Robert Jackson\u2019s influential concurrence in the Steel Seizure Case.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On Friday, October 14, 2022, Professor McConnell received the Cooley Prize at an award ceremony at the National Archives. The evening event featured the Thomas M. Cooley Judicial Lecture, by the Honorable Don Willett of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, who was previously a justice on the Supreme Court of Texas. A special thanks goes to Aaron Gordon, one of his 2021-22 law clerks, for his superb assistance in preparing this lecture. A text of the lecture can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/2022-thomas-m-cooley-judicial-lecture\/\">here<\/a>. On Saturday, Professor McConnell taught a seminar on his book to members of the Originalism Seminar Alumni Association and Georgetown Law community.<\/p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\"  id=\"_ytid_88071\"  width=\"480\" height=\"270\"  data-origwidth=\"480\" data-origheight=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/bkIyxFCxGrs?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&cc_lang_pref=&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&rel=1&fs=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&controls=1&disablekb=0&\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__  no-lazyload\" title=\"YouTube player\"  allow=\"fullscreen; accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen data-no-lazy=\"1\" data-skipgform_ajax_framebjll=\"\"><\/iframe>\n<h2>2021 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><em>No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation\u2019s Founding<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/news\/georgetown-center-for-the-constitution-awards-cooley-book-prize-to-princetons-sean-wilentz\/?fbclid=IwAR3MrFC-hkNHnpYPmJL5ECjPvlBvSVyLCEKfUlI-yMCKDZW0H7R9yOVcry0\">2021 Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize<\/a> of $50,000 was awarded to Professor Sean Wilentz of Princeton University for his book, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/No-Property-Man-Antislavery-Founding-ebook\/dp\/B07DGH6D5Y\">No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation\u2019s Founding<\/a><\/em> (Harvard University Press, 2018).\u00a0The Center\u2019s faculty director, Georgetown Law Professor\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Randy Barnett<\/a>, explained the decision:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Sean Wilentz\u2019s timely book strikes at the now-conventional wisdom that the U.S. Constitution endorsed slavery or \u201cproperty in man.\u201d Wilentz describes how the adoption of the Declaration of Independence in 1776 propelled a powerful antislavery movement. Wilentz meticulously shows that antislavery forces at the Constitutional Convention successfully resisted slaveholders\u2019 persistent efforts to include language that would expressly legitimate the concept of \u201cproperty in man.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>He then traces how the wording of the Declaration and the Constitution were effectively used by an increasingly assertive antislavery movement in the 19th Century. This agitation culminated in the formation of the antislavery Republican Party with a platform consciously designed to implement the Declaration\u2019s principles while remaining faithful to the Constitution\u2019s text. The victory of the Republican platform at the polls in 1860 immediately triggered Southern secession and the civil war that culminated in the formal amendment that ended slavery in the United States. This is a narrative that all Americans today need to know.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\"  id=\"_ytid_51095\"  width=\"480\" height=\"270\"  data-origwidth=\"480\" data-origheight=\"270\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/oyZ_wnxfuMU?enablejsapi=1&autoplay=0&cc_load_policy=0&cc_lang_pref=&iv_load_policy=1&loop=0&rel=1&fs=1&playsinline=0&autohide=2&theme=dark&color=red&controls=1&disablekb=0&\" class=\"__youtube_prefs__  no-lazyload\" title=\"YouTube player\"  allow=\"fullscreen; accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen data-no-lazy=\"1\" data-skipgform_ajax_framebjll=\"\"><\/iframe>\n<h2>2020 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>The 2020 Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize of $50,000 was awarded to Professor Keith E. Whittington of Princeton University for his book, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Repugnant-Laws-Judicial-Congress-Founding\/dp\/0700627790\/\"><em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present<\/em><\/a> (University Press of Kansas, 2019).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis book is a must-read for any serious student of our Constitution and how it actually works,\u201d said Georgetown Law <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Professor Randy Barnett<\/a>, director of the Center for the Constitution. <em>Repugnant Laws<\/em> presents the most comprehensive account of every Supreme Court decision reviewing the constitutionality of a federal statute since the nation\u2019s founding.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFacts matter and this book provides them,\u201d Barnett said.\u00a0 \u201cFrom now on, no discussion of the practice of judicial review can ignore the book\u2019s empirical findings. The most cynical political scientist will need to come to grips with its conclusion that \u2018the justices are not lapdogs, and they have often bitten the hand of the party that put them on the bench.\u2019 At the same time, idealists will need to incorporate its findings that the \u2018justices have proven themselves to be allies of [their] political coalition leaders.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Critical Papers about Whittington&#8217;s Book and their Authors:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-19-number-2-summer-2022\/repugnancy-and-restraint-a-commentary-on-keith-whittingtons-repugnant-laws\/\">Repugnancy and Restraint: A Commentary on Keith Whittington\u2019s Repugnant Laws<\/a><br \/>\nBy: Professor <a href=\"https:\/\/liberalarts.tulane.edu\/departments\/political-science\/people\/nancy-maveety\">Nancy Maveety<\/a> (politics, Tulane University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-19-number-2-summer-2022\/party-coalitions-and-supreme-court-politics-additional-lessons-from-whittingtons-repugnant-laws\/\">Party Coalitions and Supreme Court Politics: Additional Lessons from Whittington&#8217;s Repugnant Laws<\/a><br \/>\nBy: Chancellor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.uci.edu\/faculty\/affiliated\/gillman\/\">Howard Gillman<\/a> (law, University of California, Irvine)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-19-number-2-summer-2022\/story-time-with-whittington-judicial-review-in-repugnant-laws-and-commentaries-on-the-constitution\/\">Story Time with Whittington: Judicial Review in Repugnant Laws and Commentaries on the Constitution<\/a><br \/>\nBy: Professor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hillsdale.edu\/faculty\/adam-carrington\/\">Adam Carrington<\/a> (politics, Hillsdale College)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-19-number-2-summer-2022\/the-supreme-court-as-a-symbol-in-the-culture-war\/\">The Supreme Court as a Symbol in the Culture War<\/a><br \/>\nBy: Professor <a href=\"https:\/\/kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu\/home\">Keith E. Whittington<\/a> (politics, Princeton University)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>2019 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><em>Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court<\/em><\/h3>\n<p>Professor Richard H. Fallon, Jr. of Harvard Law School received the second Thomas M. Cooley Book Prize of $50,000 for his book, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Legitimacy-Supreme-Court-Richard-Fallon\/dp\/0674975812\"><em>Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court<\/em><\/a><em> (Harvard University Press, 2018).\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u201cProfessor Fallon\u2019s deeply scholarly and fair-minded book systematically examines a much-neglected topic in constitutional theory: exactly what makes a constitution legitimate\u2014not merely in the sense that it is accepted by the general public, but that it is <em>morally<\/em> legitimate and <em>ought<\/em> to be accepted,\u201d said the Center\u2019s faculty director, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/randy-e-barnett\/\">Professor Randy Barnett<\/a>. \u00a0\u201cThe book then uses its answer to this question to assess how the U.S. Constitution ought to be interpreted. While respectfully and knowledgeably critiquing originalism, Professor Fallon nevertheless affirms the importance of \u2018original public meaning\u2019 even to nonoriginalists.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Critical Papers about Fallon&#8217;s Book and their Authors:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/originalism-and-legitimacy\/\">Originalism and Legitimacy<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/dornsife.usc.edu\/scottsoames\/\">Scott Soames<\/a> (philosophy, University of Southern California)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/themes-from-fallon-on-constitutional-theory\/\">Themes from Fallon on Constitutional Theory<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.virginia.edu\/faculty\/profile\/lbs5w\/2846137\">Lawrence B. Solum<\/a> (law, University of Virginia)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/considering-legitimacy\/\">Considering Legitimacy<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.columbia.edu\/faculty\/gillian-metzger\">Gillian E. Metzger<\/a> (law, Columbia University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/authors-response-further-reflections-on-law-and-legitimacy-in-the-supreme-court\/\">Author\u2019s Response: Further Reflections on Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/hls.harvard.edu\/faculty\/richard-h-fallon\/\">Richard H. Fallon, Jr.<\/a> (law, Harvard University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/practice-based-constitutional-law-in-an-era-of-polarized-politics\/\">Practice-Based Constitutional Law in an Era of Polarized Politics<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu\/home\">Keith E. Whittington<\/a> (politics, Princeton University)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>2018 Book Prize<\/h2>\n<h3><em>A Great Power of Attorney: Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution<\/em><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/reason.com\/volokh\/2018\/04\/06\/announcing-the-cooley-book-prize\">The first Cooley Prize<\/a> was awarded to professors Gary Lawson (Boston University School of Law) and Guy Seidman (IDC Herzliya\u2014Radzyner School of Law). \u00a0Their book,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Great-Power-Attorney-Understanding-Constitution\/dp\/0700624252\"><em>A Great Power of Attorney: Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution<\/em><\/a> (Kansas University Press, 2017), explores what type of legal document the Constitution is and how that affects the powers it grants to government officials and the duties they owe the public.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Critical Papers about Fallon&#8217;s Book and their Authors:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-17-number-2-summer-2019\/the-elephant-problem\/\">The Elephant Problem<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/michigan.law.umich.edu\/faculty-and-scholarship\/our-faculty\/richard-primus\">Richard Primus<\/a> (law, University of Michigan)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-17-number-2-summer-2019\/is-the-constitution-a-power-of-attorney-or-a-corporate-charter-a-commentary-on-a-great-power-of-attorney-understanding-the-fiduciary-constitution-by-gary-lawson-and-guy-seidman\/\">Is the Constitution a Power of Attorney or a Corporate Charter? A Commentary on \u201cA Great Power of Attorney\u201d: Understanding the Fiduciary Constitution by Gary Lawson and Guy Seidman<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/faculty\/john-mikhail\/\">John Mikhail<\/a> (law, Georgetown University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-17-number-2-summer-2019\/the-imaginary-constitution\/\">The Imaginary Constitution<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/law.vanderbilt.edu\/bio\/suzanna-sherry\">Suzanna Sherry<\/a> (law, Vanderbilt University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-17-number-2-summer-2019\/fiduciary-constitutionalism-implications-for-self-pardons-and-non-delegation\/\">Fiduciary Constitutionalism: Implications for Self- Pardons and Non-Delegation<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fordham.edu\/school-of-law\/faculty\/directory\/full-time\/ethan-j-leib\/\">Ethan J. Leib<\/a> (law, Fordham University) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fordham.edu\/school-of-law\/faculty\/directory\/full-time\/jed-shugerman\/\">Jeb Handelsman Shugerman<\/a> (law, Fordham University)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-17-number-2-summer-2019\/authors-response-an-enquiry-concerning-constitutional-understanding\/\">Authors\u2019 Response: An Enquiry Concerning Constitutional Understanding<\/a><br \/>\nBy: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bu.edu\/law\/profile\/gary-s-lawson\/\">Gary Lawson<\/a> (law, Boston University) and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.runi.ac.il\/en\/faculty\/gseidman\/\">Guy Seidman<\/a> (law, Harry Radzyner Law School)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Cooley Book Prize, Judicial Lecture and Symposium honors the renowned legal scholar and jurist Thomas McIntyre Cooley. Cooley was a longstanding chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":58,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-252","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3564,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252\/revisions\/3564"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/58"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/constitution-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}