{"id":363,"date":"2019-04-09T10:09:29","date_gmt":"2019-04-09T14:09:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/?page_id=363"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:15:28","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:15:28","slug":"baltimore-podcaster-asserts-first-amendment-right-to-air-publicly-available-court-recordings","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/our-press-releases\/baltimore-podcaster-asserts-first-amendment-right-to-air-publicly-available-court-recordings\/","title":{"rendered":"Baltimore Podcaster Asserts First Amendment Right to Air Publicly Available Court Recordings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[Baltimore, MD] \u2014 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/\">The Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection<\/a> at Georgetown Law sent a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2019\/04\/2019.04.09-Letter-to-Baltimore-City-Circuit-Court.pdf\">letter<\/a> to Baltimore City Circuit Court officials today informing them of journalist Amelia McDonell-Parry\u2019s plans to air courtroom audio recordings in an upcoming podcast.\u00a0 The letter sets up a potential clash over the constitutionality of a Maryland <a href=\"https:\/\/law.justia.com\/codes\/maryland\/2005\/gcp\/1-201.html\">rule<\/a> that prohibits \u201cbroadcast[ing] any criminal matter, including a trial, hearing, motion, or argument, that is held in trial court.\u201d \u00a0Although other states restrict the live-broadcasting of court proceedings, Maryland appears to be unique in prohibiting people from broadcasting publicly available court recordings.<\/p>\n<p>Amelia McDonell-Parry is a local journalist and host of the upcoming season of <a href=\"http:\/\/undisclosed-podcast.com\/\"><em>Undisclosed<\/em><\/a>, an investigative-reporting podcast focused on the criminal-justice system.\u00a0 The upcoming season, which debuts on April 22, explores the prosecution of Keith Davis, Jr., who has been imprisoned since 2015 on attempted robbery and murder charges. \u00a0Davis faces his fourth murder trial, following three prior mistrials, all of which received considerable <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/local\/keith-davis-was-accused-of-murder-now-hell-face-a-fourth-trial-to-prove-he-didnt-do-it\/2017\/12\/05\/d7dab07e-d9e2-11e7-a841-2066faf731ef_story.html?noredirect=on&amp;utm_term=.fa9d041eb6bf\">press attention<\/a>. \u00a0McDonell-Parry will chronicle these legal proceedings from a critical perspective, using excerpts of recordings from Davis\u2019s prior trials to help tell his story.<\/p>\n<p>McDonell-Parry obtained these recordings directly from the court under a <a href=\"https:\/\/govt.westlaw.com\/mdc\/Document\/N1EF203503D9411E685489DC8FA89CE59?viewType=FullText&amp;originationContext=documenttoc&amp;transitionType=CategoryPageItem&amp;contextData=(sc.Default)\">provision<\/a> of Maryland law that requires audio recordings of open-court proceedings to be made \u201cavailable to any person upon written request.\u201d\u00a0 In its letter, the Institute asserts McDonell-Parry\u2019s First Amendment right to air lawfully acquired recordings and asks the court to explain why restricting her expression is necessary to \u201cfurther a state interest of the highest order\u201d (the relevant legal test).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMaryland allows anyone in the world to obtain audio recordings of criminal trials, but its broadcasting ban stifles public discussion of those very same proceedings,\u201d said McDonell-Parry.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBaltimore\u2019s court system is a matter of immense public interest, both locally and nationally,\u201d said Nicolas Riley, one of the attorneys who wrote the letter. \u00a0\u201cJournalists cannot be punished for trying to shine a light on that system, especially when they are using publicly available recordings to do so.\u00a0 In a moment of unprecedented attacks on the press, we should be deeply troubled by any efforts to punish journalists for exercising their First Amendment rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Baltimore court officials have previously considered enforcing the rule against other journalists.\u00a0 Two years ago, the court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/news\/maryland\/baltimore-city\/bs-md-ci-serial-court-recordings-20161221-story.html\">considered<\/a> holding the producers of the podcast <em>Serial<\/em> in contempt for airing audio recordings from the criminal trial of Adnan Syed.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/32\/2019\/04\/2019.04.09-Letter-to-Baltimore-City-Circuit-Court.pdf\">Read the full letter here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>About the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>ICAP uses the power of the courts to defend American constitutional rights and values.\u00a0 Based at Georgetown Law Center, ICAP draws on expert litigators, savvy litigation strategy, and the constitutional scholarship of Georgetown to vindicate individuals\u2019 rights and to protect America\u2019s constitutional way of life.\u00a0 More information about ICAP can be found at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/\">https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>About <em>Undisclosed<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <em>Undisclosed<\/em> podcast investigates wrongful convictions, and the U.S. criminal justice system, by taking a closer look at the perpetration of a crime, its investigation, the trial, and ultimate verdict . . . and finding new evidence that never made it to court.\u00a0 More information about <em>Undisclosed<\/em> can be found at <a href=\"http:\/\/undisclosed-podcast.com\/\">http:\/\/undisclosed-podcast.com\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Baltimore, MD] \u2014 The Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law sent a letter to Baltimore City Circuit Court officials today informing them of journalist Amelia McDonell-Parry\u2019s plans [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":0,"parent":26,"menu_order":34,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-363","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=363"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/363\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3116,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/363\/revisions\/3116"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/26"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/icap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}