{"id":1111,"date":"2022-06-09T13:03:08","date_gmt":"2022-06-09T17:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/?page_id=1111"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:10:07","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:10:07","slug":"weakening-the-deportation-pipeline-by-encouraging-local-law-enforcement-agencies-to-terminate-their-287g-agreements-local-strategies-grounded-in-administrative-and-moral-implications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/in-print\/volume-36-issue-3-spring-2022\/weakening-the-deportation-pipeline-by-encouraging-local-law-enforcement-agencies-to-terminate-their-287g-agreements-local-strategies-grounded-in-administrative-and-moral-implications\/","title":{"rendered":"Weakening the Deportation Pipeline By Encouraging Local Law Enforcement Agencies to Terminate their 287(g) Agreements: Local Strategies Grounded in Administrative and Moral Implications"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Continue reading <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2022\/06\/GT-GILJ220026.pdf\"><em><strong>Weakening the Deportation Pipeline By Encouraging Local Law Enforcement Agencies to Terminate their 287(g) Agreements: Local Strategies Grounded in Administrative and Moral Implications<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2022\/06\/GT-GILJ220026.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">GT-GILJ220026<\/a>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Continue reading Weakening the Deportation Pipeline By Encouraging Local Law Enforcement Agencies to Terminate their 287(g) Agreements: Local Strategies Grounded in Administrative and Moral Implications &nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1019,"featured_media":0,"parent":1079,"menu_order":6,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-1111","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1019"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1111"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1111\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1112,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1111\/revisions\/1112"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/immigration-law-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}