{"id":114,"date":"2019-09-04T16:56:06","date_gmt":"2019-09-04T20:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/?page_id=114"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:11:23","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:11:23","slug":"reaction-to-resisting-racialized-immigration-enforcement-through-community-bond-funds","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/in-print\/volume-11-issue-1-spring-2019\/reaction-to-resisting-racialized-immigration-enforcement-through-community-bond-funds\/","title":{"rendered":"Reaction to: Resisting Racialized Immigration Enforcement through Community Bond Funds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>America\u2019s insistence on dealing with immigration by confining undocumented persons is a contentious issue that invariably carries underlying implications of race, nativism, and economics. Flanagan\u2019s article discusses the historical development of civil confinement and how communities of color are over-policed. It also explores \u201ccommunity nullification,\u201d the process by which community bond funds are used to post bail for immigrants in detention centers as a part of a strategic tactic to push back against the government\u2019s immigration policies.<\/p>\n<p>Continue reading Reaction to: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/22\/2019\/09\/GT-GCRP190016.pdf\">Resisting Racialized Immigration Enforcement through Community Bond Funds<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>America\u2019s insistence on dealing with immigration by confining undocumented persons is a contentious issue that invariably carries underlying implications of race, nativism, and economics. Flanagan\u2019s article discusses the historical development of civil confinement and how communities of color are over-policed. It also explores \u201ccommunity nullification,\u201d the process by which community bond funds are used to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1192,"featured_media":0,"parent":82,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-114","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1192"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":116,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/114\/revisions\/116"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/82"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/mcrp-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}