With nearly half of American households burdened by the cost of rent, housing affordability is an increasingly salient issue in the United States. Meanwhile, analysts have referred to current government policy as \u201can expensive band-aid over a gaping hole.\u201d This has driven a search for innovative models. One such model, social housing, has generated \u201cexcitement in US housing policy circles,\u201d with policymakers claiming that it \u201csuccessfully ended housing shortages in jurisdictions around the world.\u201d However, there are two main challenges in assessing whether social housing is the right model for the United States. Firstly, what exactly constitutes \u201csocial housing\u201d is unclear. There are a variety of approaches, with varying degrees of state, nonprofit, and market involvement. Secondly, for social housing to work, it needs to be financially feasible. This Note addresses these challenges in turn. To begin, Part I explores both domestic and non-domestic social housing programs to provide a clearer picture of what exactly social housing is\u2014in theory and in practice. Subsequently, Part II presents various tools that policymakers can implement to close the model\u2019s financing gap, particularly in the American context. Finally, Part III analyzes legal strategies that policymakers can use to address a key challenge in the provision of social housing\u2014the cost of land.<\/p>\n