{"id":1027,"date":"2022-05-19T16:02:31","date_gmt":"2022-05-19T20:02:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-19-special-issue-2021\/what-could-justify-occupational-licensing-requirements\/"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:11:43","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:11:43","slug":"what-could-justify-occupational-licensing-requirements","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print-2\/volume-19-special-issue-2021\/what-could-justify-occupational-licensing-requirements\/","title":{"rendered":"What Could Justify Occupational Licensing Requirements?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last seventy or so years, occupational licensing requirements, or legal restrictions on who can work within a particular profession, have ballooned. These restrictions on freedom stand in need of justification, particularly in light of the concern that such restrictions simply amount to illegitimate rent- seeking. In this paper, I argue that most possible justifications face severe problems. Ultimately, I argue that the most promising line of defense for occupational licensing requirements is that some professions may require aiming at a minimum threshold of quality. The reason for this is that, in the absence of a floor for quality, there would be unacceptable social effects. This justification, if successful, is limited in scope, and would not justify many requirements currently in force.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/georgetown.box.com\/s\/tgvu6ldp3383n4gqkeq33bfftmbpvy1j\">Keep Reading What Could Justify Occupational Licensing Requirements?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last seventy or so years, occupational licensing requirements, or legal restrictions on who can work within a particular profession, have ballooned. These restrictions on freedom stand in need [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"parent":978,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-1027","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1027"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1027\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1936,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1027\/revisions\/1936"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/978"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}