{"id":1297,"date":"2022-12-02T09:18:09","date_gmt":"2022-12-02T14:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print\/volume-20-special-issue-2022\/will-we-ratify-the-constitution-of-knowledge\/"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:11:39","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:11:39","slug":"will-we-ratify-the-constitution-of-knowledge","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print-2\/volume-20-special-issue-2022\/will-we-ratify-the-constitution-of-knowledge\/","title":{"rendered":"Will We Ratify the Constitution of Knowledge?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The commitment to free speech and academic freedom or, more comprehensively, to what Jonathan Rauch calls \u201cthe constitution of knowledge\u201d is not compatible with \u201cinclusion\u201d as the latter is understood in administrative initiatives on its behalf. But a reconciliation comes into view once we pose the na\u0131\u00a8ve question: \u201cInclusion in what?\u201d The answer proffered here is: an academic community of inquirers, inclusion in which is as expansive as possible but for reasons independent of identity. Parsing the meanings of free speech and academic freedom brings the impersonal character of academic community into the foreground and clarifies the ethical demands associated with free inquiry.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2022\/12\/Cullen.pdf\">Keep Reading Will We Ratify the Constitution of Knowledge?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The commitment to free speech and academic freedom or, more comprehensively, to what Jonathan Rauch calls \u201cthe constitution of knowledge\u201d is not compatible with \u201cinclusion\u201d as the latter is understood [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"parent":1236,"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-1297","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1297"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1297\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1890,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1297\/revisions\/1890"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}