{"id":44,"date":"2018-05-02T12:56:28","date_gmt":"2018-05-02T16:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/?page_id=44"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:12:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:12:00","slug":"attacking-auer-and-chevron-deference-a-literature-review","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print-2\/volume-16-number-1-winter-2018\/attacking-auer-and-chevron-deference-a-literature-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Attacking Auer and Chevron Deference: A Literature Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In recent years, there has been a growing call to eliminate\u2014or at least narrow\u2014administrative law\u2019s judicial deference doctrines regarding agency interpretations of law. As part of the <em>Challenging Administrative Power Symposium<\/em> sponsored by the Georgetown Center for the Constitution and the Institute for Justice, this Article surveys the key arguments against <em>Auer<\/em> and <em>Chevron<\/em> deference that have emerged in recent years. In so doing, the Article seeks to help judges, legislators, litigants, and scholars focus their calls for reforming how courts review agency interpretations of law.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2018\/05\/16-1-Attacking-Auer-and-Chevron-Deference.pdf\">Keep Reading Attacking Auer and Chevron Deference<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In recent years, there has been a growing call to eliminate\u2014or at least narrow\u2014administrative law\u2019s judicial deference doctrines regarding agency interpretations of law. As part of the Challenging Administrative Power [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"parent":26,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-44","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2668,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44\/revisions\/2668"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/26"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}