{"id":548,"date":"2020-10-20T17:28:17","date_gmt":"2020-10-20T21:28:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/?page_id=548"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:11:50","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:11:50","slug":"originalism-and-legitimacy","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print-2\/volume-18-number-2-summer-2020\/originalism-and-legitimacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Originalism and Legitimacy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p2\">This Article expounds and defends a distinctive originalist theory of the legal content and interpretation of American constitutional law against the non- originalist view presented by Richard Fallon in Law and Legitimacy in the Supreme Court. In addition to developing a strong but workable conception of what fidelity to the Constitution demands, I rebut the familiar claim that original-ism does not have the resources to reach some normative results that have widely been taken to be constitutive of any acceptable theory of constitutional law.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2020\/10\/Originalism-and-Legitimacy-18-2.pdf\">Keep Reading: Originalism and Legitimacy <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This Article expounds and defends a distinctive originalist theory of the legal content and interpretation of American constitutional law against the non- originalist view presented by Richard Fallon in Law [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1553,"featured_media":0,"parent":508,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-548","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1553"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=548"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/548\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":551,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/548\/revisions\/551"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}