{"id":667,"date":"2021-09-24T14:19:40","date_gmt":"2021-09-24T18:19:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/?page_id=667"},"modified":"2025-05-12T11:11:48","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T15:11:48","slug":"migration-and-self-determination","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/in-print-2\/volume-18-special-issue-2020\/migration-and-self-determination\/","title":{"rendered":"Migration and Self-Determination"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Free international migration has enormous benefits. But many argue that governments can legitimately restrict migration in order to protect the supposed \u201cself-determination\u201d of natives. Some claims of this type are based on group rights theories, which hold that members of a particular racial, ethnic, or cultural group are the \u201ctrue\u201d owners of a particular territory. Others are based on notions of individual freedom of association, which analogize the rights of national governments to those of private property owners or members of a private club. This article criticizes both collective and individual rights theories that purport to justify a power to exclude migrants. It also critiques claims that migrants\u2019 \u201chome\u201d governments can curtail emigration by forcing them to stay.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/23\/2021\/09\/Somin.pdf\">Keep Reading Migration and Self-Determination<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Free international migration has enormous benefits. But many argue that governments can legitimately restrict migration in order to protect the supposed \u201cself-determination\u201d of natives. Some claims of this type are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8545,"featured_media":0,"parent":687,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"abstract.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_price":"","_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_header":"","_tribe_default_ticket_provider":"","_tribe_ticket_capacity":"0","_ticket_start_date":"","_ticket_end_date":"","_tribe_ticket_show_description":"","_tribe_ticket_show_not_going":false,"_tribe_ticket_use_global_stock":"","_tribe_ticket_global_stock_level":"","_global_stock_mode":"","_global_stock_cap":"","_tribe_rsvp_for_event":"","_tribe_ticket_going_count":"","_tribe_ticket_not_going_count":"","_tribe_tickets_list":"[]","_tribe_ticket_has_attendee_info_fields":false,"footnotes":"","_tec_slr_enabled":"","_tec_slr_layout":""},"class_list":["post-667","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"ticketed":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8545"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=667"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":670,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/667\/revisions\/670"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/687"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/public-policy-journal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}