State Autonomy in AI Governance: Reassessing Federal Preemption After Rejecting Section 43201(c)
The Senate’s decision on July 1, 2025 to strike Section 43201(c) from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act represents a clear rejection of federal efforts to enforce a decade-long moratorium on state and local regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) models and systems. This article analyzes the implications of this rejected provision, using its brief legislative life to explore deeper tensions between federal preemption and state autonomy in the governance of emerging technologies. While Section 43201(c) no longer carries legal force, the debates it provoked reveal persistent structural pressures to centralize authority at the expense of subnational regulatory capacity. The study examines the constitutional dimensions of such preemption efforts, focusing on the Tenth Amendment, the anti-commandeering doctrine, and the political safeguards of federalism. Drawing on comparative domains, including telecommunications, autonomous vehicles, and data privacy, it contends that effective AI governance depends not on silencing state actors but on enabling a cooperative federalism model that values local experimentation and responsiveness. Rather than viewing uniformity as inherently stabilizing, the analysis underscores the regulatory resilience afforded by a pluralistic, multi-jurisdictional approach to AI oversight.
Subscribe to GJLPP