In 2021, ICAP expanded its Supreme Court practice in response to the growing need for dedicated public interest litigators with specialized expertise in defending constitutional and civil rights before the nation’s highest court.  The practice is led by Supreme Court Director Kelsi Brown Corkran, who has served as lead counsel in some of the most significant civil rights cases before the Court in recent terms, including Torres v. Madrid, which held that police shooting victims are protected by the Fourth Amendment regardless of whether they are immediately apprehended, and Taylor v. Riojas, a challenge to inhumane prison conditions that marked the first time in 16 years that the Court denied qualified immunity to a government officer.  Kelsi previously led the Supreme Court Practice at Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe and served as a law clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

An important component of ICAP’s Supreme Court practice is preserving favorable civil rights and criminal justice decisions issued by the federal courts of appeals.  ICAP represented the respondent in three merits cases before the Court during the 2023 term: Grants Pass v. Johnson, an Eighth Amendment challenge to the criminalization of homelessness; Acheson Hotels v. Laufer, a disability discrimination case under the Americans with Disabilities Act; and NRA v. Vullo, involving the right of government officials to enforce the law and speak out about matters of public concern.

Since the 2021 term, ICAP has successfully defeated more than a dozen cert petitions seeking the Supreme Court’s reversal of civil rights victories involving issues ranging from the standard of care for unaccompanied refugee children in government custody to the scope of constitutional remedies for fatal excessive police force to the intent requirement for conditions-of-confinement claims by pretrial detainees to the application of federal overtime protections to migrant construction workers. ICAP also successfully represented the House Select Committee in defending against Donald Trump’s efforts to thwart the Committee’s review of records relating to the January 6^th attack on the U.S. Capitol.

ICAP has represented bipartisan groups of current and former government officials as amici addressing many of the most significant issues before the Court, including briefs on behalf of former national security officials raising the national security threats posed by the algorithmic amplification of terrorist content by social media platforms; former public officials, judges, and election experts urging the Court to reject a broad reading of the so-called independent state legislature theory; and former national security officials arguing that states and localities must be able to impose reasonable firearms restrictions as a matter of public safety and national security.

Our Work

• 8/26/24 – Filed a brief in opposition in LeBlanc v. McNeal on behalf of the respondent, who was unlawfully imprisoned for 41 days beyond his 90-day sentence because prison officials failed to convey his release date to the facility holding him.
• 7/2/24 – Filed an amicus brief in Garland v. VanDerStok on behalf of the Major Cities Chiefs Association, the Police Executive Research Forum, and dozens of current and former national security officials, law enforcement officers, and prosecutors, explaining how ATF’s “ghost gun” regulation is critical to preventing weapons from falling into the hands of malign actors (including terrorists, drug cartels, and domestic violent extremists), and enabling law enforcement to detect and prevent firearms trafficking at home and abroad.
• 5/24/24 – Filed a reply brief in support of certiorari in J.W. v. Paley on behalf of a disabled student who was tased by a school resource officer for trying to leave the school building.
• 4/22/24 – Presented oral argument in Grants Pass v. Johnson, on behalf of the involuntarily homeless residents of Grants Pass, Oregon, who successfully challenged a set of city ordinances making it unlawful to sleep anywhere on public property with so much as a blanket to survive cold nights, even if shelter is unavailable.
• 3/27/24 – Filed a merits brief in Grants Pass v. Johnson on behalf of the respondents, who are involuntarily homeless residents of Grants Pass, Oregon, and successfully challenged a set of city ordinances making it unlawful to sleep anywhere on public property with so much as a blanket to survive cold nights, even if shelter is unavailable.
• 2/21/24 – Filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in J.W. v. Paley on behalf of a disabled student who was tased by a school resource officer for trying to leave the school building.
• 2/20/24 – Filed a merits brief in National Rifle Association v. Vullo on behalf of the respondent, defending the right of government officials to enforce the law and to speak out about matters of public concern without fear that their statements will subject them to damages actions brought by entities that espouse controversial views.
• 12/28/23 – Filed a brief in opposition in Lewis County v. Helphenstine on behalf of the respondent, whose husband died in pretrial detention after jail guards failed to seek appropriate medical care for him.
• 12/18/23 – Filed an amicus brief in Gonzalez v. Trevino, urging the Supreme Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit decision dismissing, on qualified immunity grounds, a First Amendment retaliation claim by a city councilwoman who was arrested after she criticized the city manager.
• 12/7/23 – Filed an amicus brief in NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. Netchoice on behalf of national security experts, explaining the importance of content moderation by social media platforms in combating online threats to national security.
• 12/6/23 – Filed a brief in opposition in Grants Pass v. Johnson on behalf of the respondents, who are involuntarily homeless residents of Grants Pass, Oregon, and successfully challenged a set of city ordinances making it unlawful to sleep anywhere on public property with so much as a blanket to survive cold nights, even if shelter is unavailable.
• 10/23/23 – Filed an amicus brief in Moore v. United States on behalf of professors of tax law, legal history, and computational science arguing that the original meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to tax unrealized income.
• 10/4/23 – Presented oral argument in Acheson Hotels v. Laufer on behalf of the respondent, defending the right of people with disabilities to bring suit against hotels that violate the ADA by failing to make their online reservation services accessible.
• 9/14/23 – Filed a brief in opposition and stay opposition in Roper v. Crane and City of Arlington v. Crane on behalf of the respondents, who brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after a police officer shot their son to death for simply verbally resisting a request that he step out of his parked car, in the absence of any immediate threat or attempt to flee.
• 8/2/23 – Filed a merits brief in Acheson Hotels v. Laufer on behalf of the respondent, defending the right of people with disabilities to bring suit against hotels that violate the ADA by failing to make their online reservation services accessible.
• 6/14/23 – Filed a brief in opposition in Signet Builders v. Luna Vanegas on behalf of the respondent, a migrant construction worker, challenging the petitioner’s failure to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime compensation requirements.
• 5/12/23 – Filed an amicus brief in Gonzalez v. Trevino, urging the Supreme Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit decision dismissing, on qualified immunity grounds, a First Amendment retaliation claim by a city councilwoman who was arrested after she criticized the city manager.
• 2/22/23 – Filed a brief in opposition in Huffman v. Harris on behalf of the respondent, the guardian of a man with severe mental illness who was unlawfully imprisoned for six years after he was determined incompetent to stand trial, opposing review of the Fifth Circuit’s determination that his jailers violated his clearly established due process rights.
• 12/7/22 – Filed an amicus brief in Gonzalez v. Google on behalf of former national security officials, raising the national security threats facilitated by algorithmic amplification of terrorist content by social media platforms.
• 11/18/22 – Filed an amicus brief in Arkansas Times v. Waldrip on behalf of Jewish community organizations, explaining why an Arkansas law prohibiting the practice of consumer boycotts of Israel by state contractors is inconsistent with the First Amendment.
• 11/4/22 – Filed a brief in opposition in City of Orange v. Craig on behalf of the respondents, whose son was unlawfully killed by a police officer, urging the Court to deny review of the Ninth Circuit’s affirmance of the jury verdict awarding loss of life damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
• 10/26/22 – Filed an amicus brief in Moore v. Harper on behalf of a bipartisan group of former public officials, former judges, and election experts from Pennsylvania, urging the Court to reject a broad reading of the so-called independent state legislature theory.
• 10/11/22 – Filed a brief in opposition in University of Toledo v. Wamer on behalf of the respondent, a college student who was sexually harassed by her professor, opposing review of the Sixth Circuit’s holding that the University is liable under Title IX if it responded with deliberate indifference to the student’s sexual harassment report and the school’s failure to act forced the student to forego educational opportunities in order to avoid additional harassment.
• 9/26/22 – Filed a brief in opposition in City of Anaheim v. Valenzuela on behalf of the respondents, whose father was unlawfully killed by police, urging the Court to deny review of the Ninth Circuit’s affirmance of the jury verdict awarding loss of life damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
• 9/6/22 – Filed a brief in oppositionin Ritter v. Migliori on behalf of the respondent judicial candidate, opposing review of a Third Circuit decision holding that the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s materiality provision prohibited throwing out ballots that were undated but timely filed.
• 8/26/22 – Filed an amicus brief in Brown v. Louisiana on behalf of current and former prosecutors, urging the Court to reverse David Brown’s death sentence after the State failed to disclose a statement directly implicating two other people, but not Brown, in the murder of a prison guard.
• 3/8/22 – Filed a reply brief in support of certiorari in Herrera v. Cleveland on behalf on the petitioner, a pre-trial detainee seeking to bring suit against the prison guards who ignored his pleas for help when he was brutally attacked in his cell.
• 2/15/22 – Filed an amicus brief in Hope v. Harris on behalf of current and former prosecutors, urging the Court to review a challenge to Texas’s improper use of solitary confinement.
• 12/30/21 – Filed a brief in opposition and an opposition to the application for a stay in Trump v. Thompson on behalf of the respondent House Select Committee, opposing Donald Trump’s request for Supreme Court review of his challenge to the release of Presidential records relating to the Committee’s investigation of the January 6^th attack on the Capitol.
• 11/19/21 – Filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in Herrera v. Cleveland on behalf of the petitioner, a pre-trial detainee seeking to bring suit against the prison guards who ignored his pleas for help when he was brutally attacked in his cell.
• 10/29/21 – Filed a brief in opposition in Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Center v. Doe on behalf of the respondent class of juvenile immigration detainees, opposing review of the Fourth Circuit’s decision to apply a heightened standard of care for unaccompanied refugee children in government custody.
• 9/21/21 – Filed an amicus brief in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen on behalf of former national security officials, urging the Court to recognize the constitutionality of certain restrictions on firearms possession designed to protect national security and public safety.
• 6/11/21 – Filed an amicus brief in Thompson v. Clark on behalf of former prosecutors, Department of Justice officials, and judges, supporting a challenge to a rule foreclosing malicious prosecution claims where the plaintiff’s underlying criminal case was dismissed before trial without an “affirmative indication of innocence.”
• 1/4/21 – Filed an amicus brief in Thompson v. Clark on behalf of former prosecutors, Department of Justice officials, and judges, urging the Court to review a challenge to a rule foreclosing malicious prosecution claims where the plaintiff’s underlying criminal case was dismissed before trial without an “affirmative indication of innocence.”
• 11/16/20 – Filed an amicus brief in Trump v. State of New York on behalf of the U.S. House of Representatives, supporting a challenge to an executive memo calling for the apportionment of the House to exclude undocumented immigrants.
• 10/3/19 – Filed an amicus brief in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California on behalf of current and former prosecutors and law enforcement leaders, opposing the Trump Administration’s efforts to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
• 8/27/19 – Filed an amicus brief in Mathena v. Malvo on behalf of current and former prosecutors, Department of Justice officials, and judges, arguing that when a juvenile is convicted of capital murder under state law, the Eighth Amendment requires consideration of the juvenile’s youth before sentencing him to life without parole.
• 4/1/19 – Filed an amicus brief in U.S. Department of Commerce v. State of New York on behalf of the U.S. House of Representatives, supporting a challenge to the Commerce Department’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the census.
• 4/5/18 – Filed an amicus brief in Williams v. Louisiana on behalf of former prosecutors and Department of Justice officials, urging the Court to review and reverse a criminal conviction obtained through prosecutorial misconduct.
• 3/8/18 – Filed an amicus brief in Parkinson v. Department of Justice on behalf of former FBI employees, the National Whistleblower Center, and the Project on Government Oversight, urging the Court to review a Federal Circuit decision barring preference-eligible FBI whistleblowers from raising retaliation as an affirmative defense before the Merit Systems Protection Board.
• 9/15/17 – Filed an amicus brief in Hidalgo v. Arizona on behalf of the Fair Punishment Project, arguing that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment.