Related Citations
-
Dan T. Coenen, The Originalist Case Against Congressional Supermajority Voting Rules, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1091 (2012).
-
Akhil Reed Amar, America’s Constitution: A Biography 143 (2012).
-
Jaynie Randall, Sundays Excepted, 59 Ala. L. Rev. 507, 508 (2008).
-
John F. Manning, Textualism and the Equity of the Statute, 101 Colum. L. Rev. 1, 72-73 (2001).
-
John O. McGinnis & Michael B. Rappaport, The Rights of Legislators and the Wrongs of Interpretation: A Further Defense of the Constitutionality of Legislative Supermajority Rules, 47 Duke L.J. 327 (1997).
-
Michael B. Rappaport, Veto Burdens and the Line Item Veto Act, 91 Nw. U. L. Rev. 771 (1997).
-
Michael B. Rappaport, The President’s Veto and the Constitution, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 735 (1993).
-
Maxwell L. Stearns, The Public Choice Case Against the Item Veto, 49 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 385 (1992).
-
L. Gordon Crovitz, The Line-Item Veto: The Best Response When Congress Passes One Spending “Bill” A Year, 18 Pepp. L. Rev. 43, 47 (1990).
-
Thomas Stefan Schroeder, Original Understanding and Veto Power: Are the Framers Safe While Congress is in Session, J.L. & Pol. 757 (1990).
-
Judith A. Best, The Line-Item Veto: Would The Founders Approve?, 14 Pres. Stud. Q. 183 (1984).