The 2024 writing competition is now open. This year’s topic is Emerging Biotechnologies and Their Relationships to Personal Freedoms.

Biotechnology has played an evermore increasing part in our lives, from the biometric data collected in our smartwatch to the vaccine we took during the pandemic. But as these innovations can be utilized to solve global health crises, find early signs of disease, or even alert authorities to urgent health issues, they can also intersect with the rights of privacy, speech, and reproduction. Consider how some women, with the overturning of Roe, worried that their private data would be used to target those who sought abortions. Or consider how doctors in many states are barred from recommending certain treatments to those in the LGBTQ+ community–medical advances and the law are invariably intertwined.

This year’s writing competition invites submissions on Emerging Biotechnologies and Their Relationships to Personal Freedoms. For purposes of determining what topics fall within the scope of this writing competition, the terms “biotechnologies,” “personal,” and “freedoms” should be broadly construed, and in no way limited to the examples given above.

Example topics could include, but are by no means limited to: using artificial intelligence to diagnose; the use of femtech and the privacy concerns surrounding it; biotechnology and informed consent; social justice and allowing everyone access to biotech innovation; emerging reproductive technology and their relation to Dobbs; and biotech uses in the field of national security concerns.

Students are invited to submit papers that provide analysis or insights derived from or related to these questions, that examine proposed or newly-enacted laws related to the questions, or that propose novel legal structures to engage with current acts.

Papers will be judged by a fully-blind panel of judges. The author(s) of the first place paper will be awarded $2,000; the author(s) of the second place paper will be awarded $500.

Submission requirements

Please submit papers via email to techinstitute@law.georgetown.edu. Submissions are due on June 3, 2024.

Papers will be accepted from students enrolled at any ABA-accredited law school in the United States during the 2024-2025 academic year. The paper must be the author’s own work, although students may incorporate feedback received as part of an academic course or supervised writing project. The paper must not have been published or committed for publication in another journal; the Georgetown Law Technology Review must have the first right of publication for any winning essay. Publication of winning papers in the Georgetown Law Technology Review is not guaranteed, and is up to the discretion of the editorial board.

Papers will be evaluated based on thoroughness of research and analysis, relevance to the competition topic, relevance to current legal and/or public policy debates, originality of thought, and clarity of expression.

Papers should be 3000-5000 words long (not including footnotes) and be submitted in Times New Roman size 12 font, single spaced. Footnotes must conform to the 20th edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. Papers must be in English.

2023 Winners

First Place

Sean Norick Long, Alejandra Catharia Uria, and Elena Sokoloski

Second Place

Cleo-Symone Scott

Third Place

Johanna Hahn

2023 Writing Competition

The 2023 competition challenged students to explore emerging technologies, new applications of technologies, and their relationships to social justice. A panel of judges selected the three winners in a fully-blind judging process from dozens of submissions to the competition.

1st Place: Sean Norick Long, Georgetown University; Alejandra Catharia Uria, Yale University; and Elena Sokoloski, Yale University. “Digital Access to Justice: Automating Court Fee Waivers in Oklahoma”

2nd Place: Cleo-Symone Scott, University of Richmond. “Biopiracy: Using New Laws and Databases to Protect Indigenous Communities”

3rd Place: Johanna Hahn, Harvard University. “Blame the Human, Not (Just) the Algorithm: Regulating Facial Recognition Technology to Prevent Wrongful Arrests”

2022 Winners

First Place

Alyssa Rose Domino

Second Place

Eric Leis

Third Place

Yinuo Geng

2022 Writing Competition

A panel of judges selected the three winners in a fully-blind judging process from the more than forty submissions to the competition. Thank you to all who submitted papers, as well as our judges who took the time to review and select our winners this year.

1st Place: Alyssa Rose Domino, Georgetown University Law Center, “From Food on a Platter to Food on the Platform: Datafication of the Restaurant Industry”

2nd Place: Eric Leis, The Law School at University of Notre Dame, “Judicial Review of Commissioner HAL 9000”

3rd Place: Yinuo Geng, Georgetown University Law Center, “Comparing ‘Deepfake’ Regulatory Regimes in the United States, the European Union and China”

Honorable Mention: Gabriella Mills, University of Houston Law Center, “The Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in the Sociological Sphere: Pretrial Risk Assessments, Domestic Violence, and the Bias Between”

2021 Winners

First Place

Matthew Leiwant

Second Place

Dana Holmstrand

Third Place

Rachel Anderson

2021 Writing Competition

The competition, conducted with generous support from BSA | The Software Alliance, challenged students to explore the emerging and sustained challenges to legal and political structures created by online platforms, digital services, and other emerging technologies. A panel of judges—comprising representatives from academia, civil society, and industry—selected the three winners in a fully-blind judging process from the more than forty submissions to the competition.

1st Place: Matthew Leiwant, Georgetown University, “Locked Out: How Algorithmic Tenant Screening Exacerbates the Eviction Crisis in the United States”

2nd Place: Dana Holmstrand, Georgetown University, “A Haunted (Smart) House: Smart Home Devices as Tools of Harassment and Abuse”

3rd Place: Rachel Anderson, University of Virginia, “Geo-Targeting Jurisdiction: Online Ads and the Economics of Specific Jurisdiction”