Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Discusses Gender Equality, in Life and in Law
July 5, 2019
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg speaks at 'A Legacy of Gender Equality' in Hart Auditorium on July 2.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke to a packed auditorium at Georgetown Law on Tuesday, July 2, discussing gender equality in her personal life and in the law with two of her former law clerks: Ruthanne Deutsch (Lā04, LL.M.ā16) of Deutsch Hunt PLLC, and Dori Bernstein (LL.M.’89), who served as director of Georgetown Law’s Supreme Court Institute for the past nine years. Deutsch and Bernstein are also former fellows in the Law Center’s Appellate Litigation Clinic.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, onstage in Hart Auditorium, chats with Ruthanne Deutsch and Adjunct Professor Dori Bernstein.
During the hour-long conversation, Justice Ginsburg shared stories about her late husband Martin Ginsburg, a beloved Georgetown Law tax professor who died in 2010. As she has said many times, Justice Ginsburg noted that “Marty” was the first boy sheād met who cared that she had a brain.
When they met as undergraduates at Cornell, he had a girlfriend at Smith College, and she had a boyfriend at Columbia Law School. āOur friends thought, āWell, it’s a long cold winter [in Ithaca],āā she said, setting off laughter in the audience. For two years, the pair became close friends. She said he was so confident, he never saw her intellect as a threat.
Extraordinary
Justice Ginsburg said her in-laws were even more extraordinary. On Ruth and Martinās wedding day, Martyās mother took the bride aside and shared her secret to a happy marriage: āSometimes it helps to be a little deaf.ā
In the Ginsburg home, the Justice said she and Marty didnāt negotiate chores; rather, they each did what was needed at different times.
āWhen the women’s movement came alive at the end of the ’60s, and Marty realized [that] what I was doing [in my career] was very important, he took on more of the homework,ā she said.
Justice Ginsburg saw a change in gender roles even when her children were young. When her daughter Jane was born in 1955, Ginsburg was one of very few working moms. By the end of the following decade, when son James went to school, it was no longer unusual to have two-earner families.
Roads not taken
Bernstein asked the Justice what would have happened if sheād had no problem getting hired as a lawyer straight out of law school. The Justice said that she and retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (who graduated at the top of her class at Stanford Law but couldnāt get a job right away) were fortunate in the end. ā[Justice OāConnor] said to me, āThink about what our lives would have been if thereād been no discrimination,’ā Justice Ginsburg said. āWeād be retired partners from some law firm. But because we didnāt have that route, we had to find another way.ā
Deutsch asked the Justice whether sheād ever considered writing fiction, since she studied with Vladimir Nabokov at Cornell.
āNever,ā the Justice said, ābecause I donāt have the talent to do that. But Nabokov was a major influence on the way I read and the way I write. He was a magnificent teacher.ā
Unconscious bias
Bernstein noted that in 2019, the centennial of the 19th Amendment which enabled women to vote, we have a record 117 women in Congress. Still, “women have not come close to political parity in this country,ā holding just a quarter of the seats in Congress and one-third in the Supreme Court. The Justice agreed that the numbers are impressive but not impressive enough. She noted that this term saw a new first in the Court: with Justice Brett Kavanaughās staff of all-female clerks, there were more women than men clerking at the Supreme Court for the first time in the nation’s history.
Ginsburg said that while most of the explicit gender-based classifications and barriers are gone today, “what remains is unconscious bias.ā She noted the dramatic change in the gender of musicians at symphonies, once the musicians began auditioning behind a curtain. The Justice lamented that we canāt replicate that curtain in other areas.
All-star analysis
After the conversation, CNN legal analyst and Supreme Court biographer Joan Biskupic (Lā93, Hā14) moderated a panel that included Judge Cornelia (“Nina”) Pillard of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (also a former Georgetown Law professor); Katie Gibson, professor of Rhetorical Studies at Colorado State University and author of Ruth Bader Ginsburgās Legacy of Dissent: Feminist Rhetoric and the Law; Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Womenās Law Center; and Elizabeth Wydra (LL.M.ā09), president of the Constitutional Accountability Center.

Joan Biskupic (Lā93, Hā14)(center) moderated a panel that included Cornelia (“Nina”) Pillard (left), Katie Gibson, Elizabeth Wydra (LL.M.ā09) and Fatima Goss Graves (right).
They discussed the Justiceās history of championing equal rights for men as well as women, her powerful use of precedent and history in her opinions and her fierce attention to language, using it to challenge rhetorical conventions and persuade the Court to see the law from a broader vantage point.
Wydra noted that July 2 was Thurgood Marshallās birthday. āIn so many ways, Justice Ginsburg is an inspiration in the way that Thurgood Marshall was an inspiration,ā she said. āBoth were brilliant jurists and brilliant litigation strategists.ā
‘Notorious RBG’
The audience of more than 300 students, alumni, faculty and others were enthusiastic throughout the event and gave Justice Ginsburg two standing ovations.

Dean William M. Treanor.
As he introduced the Justice, a frequent speaker at the Law Center, Dean William M. Treanor said that some of his favorite moments as dean include walking into a packed room where Justice Ginsburg is about to address a first-year law class (many wearing āNotorious RBGā t-shirts) and seeing the excitement and admiration on students’ faces.
āEvery time it happens,ā Treanor said, āI always think, āWhat more inspiring way to start a legal career?’ā
Watch the full event below.