Related Citations
-
Christopher W. Schmidt, Originalism and Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, 75 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 33 (2018).
-
William D. Araiza, Arming the Second Amendment—And Enforcing the Fourteenth, 74 Wash & Lee L. Rev. 1801 (2017).
-
Kurt T. Lash, Beyond Incorporation, 18 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 447 (2009).
-
Keith S. Alexander, Federalism, Abortion, and the Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment Enforcement Power: Can Congress Ban Partial-Birth Abortion After Carhart?, 13 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 105 (2008).
-
Rebecca E. Zietlow, Juriscentrism and the Original Meaning of Section Five, 13 Temp. Pol. & C.R.L. Rev. 485 (2008).
-
Steven G. Calabresi & Nicholas P. Stabile, On Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1431 (2008).
-
James W. Fox Jr., Re-readings and Misreadings: Slaughter-House, Privileges or Immunities, and Section Five Enforcement Powers, 91 Ky. L.J. 67 (2002).
-
Ruth Colker, The Supreme Court’s Historical Errors in City of Boerne v. Flores, 43 B.C. L. Rev. 783 (2001).
-
Evan H. Caminker, “Appropriate” Means-Ends Constraints on Section 5 Power, 53 Stan. L. Rev. 1127 (2000).
-
Saikrishna Prakash, A Comment on Congressional Enforcement, 32 Ind. L. Rev. 193 (1998).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Institutions and Interpretations: A Critique of City of Boerne v. Flores, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 153 (1997).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions, 81 Va. L. Rev. 947 (1995).