Related Citations
-
Carl H. Esbeck, The Establishment Clause: Its Original Public Meaning and What We Can Learn from the Plain Text, 22 Federalist Soc’y Rev. 26 (2021).
-
Neil Joseph, Let History Repeat Itself: Solving Originalism’s History Problem in Interpreting the Establishment Clause, 15 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y Sidebar 1 (2020).
-
Stephanie H. Barclay, Brady Earley & Annika Boone, Original Meaning & the Establishment Clause: A Corpus Linguistics Analysis, 61 Ariz. L. Rev. 505 (2019).
-
J. Clifford Wallace, The United States’ Approach to Curtailing the Government’s Establishment of Religion, 62-Jan Advocate (Idaho) 49 (2019).
-
Ethan Bercot, Forgetting to Weight: The Use of History in the Supreme Court’s Establishment Clause, 102 Geo. L.J. 845 (2014).
-
Patrick M. Garry, Distorting the Establishment Clause into an Individual Dissenter’s Right, 7 Charleston L. Rev. 661 (2013).
-
Carl H. Esbeck, Uses and Abuses of Textualism and Originalism in Establishment Clause Interpretation, 2011 Utah L. Rev. 489 (2011).
-
Andrew Koppelman, Phony Originalism and the Establishment Clause, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 727 (2009).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Religion and Its Relation to Limited Government, 33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 943 (2009).
-
Douglas G. Smith, The Constitutionality of Religious Symbolism After McCreary and Van Orden, 12 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 93 (2007).
-
Douglas Laycock, Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1793 (2006).
-
Marci A. Hamilton & Rachel Steamer, The Religious Origins of Disestablishment Principles, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1755 (2006).
-
Vincent Phillip Muñoz, The Original Meaning of the Establishment Clause and the Impossibility of Its Incorporation, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 585 (2006).
-
Robert G. Natelson, The Original Meaning of the Establishment Clause, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 73 (2005).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Establishment and Disestablishment at the Founding, Part I: Establishment of Religion, 44 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2105 (2003).
-
Lee J. Strang, The Meaning of “Religion” in the First Amendment, 40 Duq. L. Rev. 181 (2002).
-
Michael W. McConnell, The Problem of Singling Out Religion, 50 DePaul L. Rev. 1 (2000).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Why Is Religious Liberty the ‘First Freedom’?, 21 Cardozo L. Rev. 1243 (1999).
-
Kurt T. Lash, Power and the Subject of Religion, 59 Ohio St. L.J. 1069 (1998).
-
Kurt T. Lash, The Status of Constitutional Religious Liberty at the End of the Millenium, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1 (1998).
-
Akhil Amar, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction 41 (1998).
-
Jay Alan Sekulow, James Matthew Henderson, Sr. & Kevin E. Broyles, Religious Freedom and the First Self-Evident Truth: Equality as a Guiding Principle in Interpreting the Religion Clauses, 4 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 351 (1995).
-
Kurt Lash, The Second Adoption of the Establishment Clause: The Rise of the Nonestablishment Principle, 27 Ariz. St. L.J. 1085 (1995).
-
Douglas Laycock, “Nonpreferential” Aid to Religion: A False Claim About Original Intent, 27 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 875 (1985).
-
Philip B. Kurtland, The Origins of the Religion Clauses of the Constitution, 27 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 839 (1985).
-
Michael W. McConnell, Coercion: The Lost Element of Establishment, 27 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 925 (1985).