Related Citations
-
Robert G. Natelson, The Original Meaning of “Emoluments” in the Constitution, 52 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2017).
-
Seth Barrett Tillman, The Original Public Meaning of the Foreign Emoluments Clause: A Reply to Professor Zephyr Teachout, 107 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 180 (2013).
-
Seth Barrett Tillman, Conference Paper: Six Puzzles for Professor Akhil Amar (Loyola University of Chicago Law School, Fourth Annual Constitutional Law Colloquium Conference, Nov. 1, 2013).
-
Seth Barrett Tillman, Either/Or: Professors Zephyr Rain Teachout and Akhil Reed Amar–Contradictions and Suggested Reconciliation, 96 n.170 (January 1, 2012).
-
Seth Barrett Tillman, Citizens United and the Scope of Professor Teachout’s Anti-Corruption Principle, 107 Nw. U. L. Rev. 399 (2012).
-
Note, The Ineligibility Clause’s Lost History: Presidential Patronage and Congress, 1787-1850, 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1727 (2010).
-
Seth Barrett Tillman, Why Our Next President May Keep His or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture on the Constitution’s Incompatibility Clause, 4 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol’y 1 (2008).
-
David J. Shaw, An Officer and a Congressman: The Unconstitutionality of Congressmen in the Armed Forces, 97 Geo. L.J. 1739 (2009).
-
Zephyr Teachout, The Anti-Corruption Principle, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 341, 359 (2009).
-
John F. O’Connor, The Emoluments Clause: An Anti-Federalist Intruder in A Federalist Constitution, 24 Hofstra L. Rev. 89 (1995).
-
Steven G. Calabresi & Joan L. Larsen, One Person, One Office: Separation of Powers or Separation of Personnel?, 79 Cornell L. Rev. 1045 (1994).