Philadelphia Bail Fund v. Bernard
ICAP successfully represented the Philadelphia Bail Fund in a First Amendment suit challenging Pennsylvania court rules that prohibit the public from audio-recording bail hearings.
Filings
- 5/4/21 – Order granting defendant magistrate judges’ voluntary dismissal of appeal handed down by Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- 1/11/21 – Order granting petition for rehearing en banc handed down by Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- 12/9/20 – Opposition to petition for rehearing en banc filed by defendant magistrate judges
- 11/19/20 – Amicus briefs filed by Professor Eugene Volokh, Arthur Rizer, The Cato Institute, and R Street Institute; American Civil Liberties Union and Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts; and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 19 media organizations in support of Plaintiff-Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc
- 11/12/20 – Petition for rehearing en banc filed in Third Circuit Court of Appeals by Philadelphia Bail Fund
- 9/29/20 – Panel opinion issued by Third Circuit Court of Appeals (N.B. this opinion was subsequently vacated by the Court’s order granting rehearing en banc on 1/11/2021)
- 6/12/20 – Appellants’ reply brief filed by defendant magistrate judges
- 6/5/20 – Amicus briefs filed by Cato Institute, American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, and Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts; Defender Association of Philadelphia and Philadelphia Chapter of the Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 14 media organizations in support of Plaintiff-Appellee
- 5/29/20 – Appellee’s response brief filed by Philadelphia Bail Fund
- 5/1/20 – Appellants’ opening brief filed in Third Circuit Court of Appeals by defendant magistrate judges
- 2/25/20 – Obtained order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff
- 1/13/20 – Replies filed by the defendant sheriff and magistrate judges in opposition to Philadelphia Bail Fund’s motion for summary judgment
- 1/6/20 – Responses to cross motions for summary judgment filed by Philadelphia Bail Fund and the defendant sheriff and magistrate judges
- 12/20/19 – Cross motions for summary judgment filed by Philadelphia Bail Fund and the defendant sheriff and magistrate judges
- 12/11/19 – Stipulated facts and exhibits filed by both parties
- 11/13/19 – Received orders denying both motions to dismiss, without prejudice
- 10/23/19 – Replies filed by the defendant sheriff and magistrate judges in support of their motions to dismiss
- 10/16/19 – Consolidated opposition filed by the Philadelphia Bail Fund to the defendants’ motions to dismiss
- 9/18/19 – Motion to dismiss filed by defendant magistrate judges
- 9/4/19 – Motion to dismiss filed by defendant sheriff
- 7/17/19 – Complaint filed by the Philadelphia Bail Fund challenging Pennsylvania’s ban on audio-recording bail hearings