Jolt v. Paxton
ICAP represents Jolt Initiative, a nonprofit that promotes civic engagement and voter registration among young Latinos in Texas. In August 2024, fueled by the circulation of extremist social media conspiracy theories about noncitizen voting, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton began targeting Latino-focused voter registration groups, including Jolt, for baseless and invasive investigations. In response to the Attorney General’s targeting of Jolt by requesting confidential information about its volunteers and the voters they registered, we filed suit in September of 2024 to enjoin enforcement of that request alleging that the request violated the First and Fourth Amendments, as well as the Voting Rights Act. Rather than defend the legality of the document request in court, Paxton withdrew the demand and secured Jolt’s agreement to dismiss the case based on the Attorney General’s assurances that he would not file another document request on the same subject matter.
On the same day Jolt’s case was closed, the Attorney General filed a civil “quo warranto” lawsuit in state court that seeks to dissolve Jolt’s corporate charter and end its operations in Texas based on the same false allegations on which he attempted to justify his previous investigation. This action violates Jolt’s constitutionally protected expressive voter registration activity and is in blatant retaliation for Jolt’s first lawsuit–an exercise of its First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
While our co-counsel in Texas defends Jolt in state court, we sued Attorney General Paxton in federal court in November of 2025, bringing new First Amendment and Voting Rights Act claims and asking for an immediate halt to Paxton’s unconstitutional and retaliatory campaign against Jolt.
Filings
- 11/11/25 – ICAP filed a new lawsuit and motion for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas asking the federal court to halt the Attorney General’s attempt to dissolve Jolt’s charter in retaliation for its First Amendment activities
- 10/23/25 – The Attorney General files a motion in Texas state court (Tarrant County) requesting that the court dissolve Jolt’s charter
- 10/23/25 – Federal court closes Jolt’s case, relying upon the State’s representations
- 10/22/25 – The Attorney General withdrew the request to examine (RTE) and secured Jolt’s agreement to voluntarily dismiss its case by promising not to serve another RTE concerning the same subject matter
- 10/24/24 – Case is stayed pending further order of the court, and Jolt is not required to produce documents in the interim
- 10/11/24 – Filed a consolidated brief responding to defendant’s motion to dismiss and replying in support of a motion for a preliminary injunction
- 9/20/24 – Filed an amended motion for a preliminary injunction
- 9/13/24 – Filed a Complaint and TRO to enjoin enforcement of the Attorney General’s intrusive document request