Related Citations
-
Robert G. Natelson, Is the Constitution’s Convention for Proposing Amendments a “Mystery”? Overlooked Evidence in the Narrative of Uncertainty, 104 Marq. L. Rev. 1 (2020).
-
Robert G. Natelson, Founding-Era Conventions and the Meaning of the Constitution’s “Convention for Proposing Amendments,” 65 Fla. L. Rev. 615 (2013).
-
Michael B. Rappaport, The Constitutionality of a Limited Convention: An Originalist Analysis, 28 Const. Comment. 53 (2012).
-
Robert G. Natelson, Proposing Constitutional Amendments by Convention: Rules Governing the Process, 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 693 (2011).
-
James Kenneth Rogers, The Other Way to Amend the Constitution: The Article V Constitutional Convention Amendment Process, 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 1005 (2007).
-
Kurt T. Lash, Rejecting Conventional Wisdom: Federalist Ambivalence in the Framing and Implementation of Article V, 38 Am. J. Legal Hist. 197 (1994).
-
Grover Rees III, Constitutional Conventions and Constitutional Arguments: Some Thoughts About Limits, 6 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 79 (1982).
-
William W. Van Alstyne, The Limited Constitutional Convention—The Recurring Answer, 1979 Duke L.J. 985 (1979).
-
Neal S. Manne, Good Intentions, New Inventions, and Article V Constitutional Conventions, 58 Tex. L. Rev. 131 (1979).
-
Charles L. Black, Jr., The Proposed Amendment of Article V: A Threatened Disaster, 72 Yale L.J. 957 (1963).