Related Citations
-
Sean M. O’Connor, The Overlooked French Influence on the Intellectual Property Clause, 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 733 (2015).
-
Stuart V. C. Duncan Smith, Individualism and Republicanism in the Intellectual Property Clause, 19 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 432 (2013).
-
Ned Snow, The Meaning of Science in the Copyright Clause, 2013 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 259 (2013).
-
Jeanne C. Fromer, The Intellectual Property Clause’s External Limitations, 61 Duke L.J. 1329 (2012).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, Originalism and the IP Clause: A Commentary on Professor Oliar’s “New Reading,” 58 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 113 (2010).
-
Dotan Oliar, The (Constitutional) Convention on IP: A New Reading, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 421, 423 (2009).
-
Adam Mossoff, Who Cares What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Patents? Reevaluating the Patent “Privilege” in Historical Context, 92 Cornell L. Rev. 953 (2007).
-
Craig W. Dallon, Original Intent and the Copyright Clause: Eldred v. Ashcroft Gets It Right, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. 307 (2006).
-
Dotan Oliar, Making Sense of the Intellectual Property Clause: Promotion of Progress As A Limitation on Congress’s Intellectual Property Power, 94 Geo. L.J. 1771 (2006).
-
Thomas B. Nachbar, Intellectual Property and Constitutional Norms, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 272 (2004).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, The Preambular Argument: The Dubious Premise of Eldred v. Ashcroft, 44 IDEA 331 (2004).
-
Pamela Samuelson, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 (2003).
-
Paul M. Schwartz & William Michael Treanor, Eldred and Lochner: Copyright Term Extension and Intellectual Property As Constitutional Property, 112 Yale L.J. 2331 (2003).
-
Kevin D. Galbraith, Forever on the Installment Plan? An Examination of the Constitutional History of the Copyright Clause and Whether the Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 Squares with the Founders’ Intent, 12 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1119 (2002).
-
Malla Pollack, The Multiple Unconstitutionality of Business Method Patents: Common Sense, Congressional Consideration, and Constitutional History, 28 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 61 (2002).
-
Lawrence B. Solum, Congress’s Power to Promote the Progress of Science: Eldred v. Ashcroft, 36 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1 (2002).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, The Nature Of The Intellectual Property Clause: A Study In Historical Perspective (2002).
-
Tyler T. Ochoa & Mark Rose, The Anti-Monopoly Origins of the Patent and Copyright Clause, 84 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y 909 (2002).
-
Lawrence Lessig, Copyright’s First Amendment, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 1057 (2001).
-
Malla Pollack, What Is Congress Supposed to Promote?: Defining “Progress” in Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, or Introducing the Progress Clause, 80 Neb. L. Rev. 754 (2001).
-
Paul J. Heald & Suzanna Sherry, Implied Limits on the Legislative Power: The Intellectual Property Clause As an Absolute Constraint on Congress, 2000 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1119 (2000).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, Defining the Patent and Copyright Term: Term Limits and the Intellectual Property Clause, 7 J. Intell. Prop. L. 315 (2000).
-
Robert Patrick Merges & Glenn Harlan Reynolds, The Proper Scope of the Copyright and Patent Power, 37 Harv. J. on Legis. 45 (2000).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, Conforming the General Welfare Clause and the Intellectual Property Clause, 13 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 87 (1999).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, Inherent or Created Rights: Early Views on the Intellectual Property Clause, 19 Hamline L. Rev. 81 (1995).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, Priority of Invention: How the United States Came to Have a “First-to-Invent” Patent System, 23 AIPLA Q.J. 263 (1995).
-
Edward C. Walterscheid, To Promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts: The Background and Origin of the Intellectual Property Clause of the United States Constitution, 2 J. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (1994).
-
Irah Donner, The Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Framers Include It With Unanimous Approval?, 36 Am. J. Leg. Hist. 361 (1992).