Related Citations
-
Robert G. Natelson, Federal Land Retention and the Constitution’s Property Clause: The Original Understanding, 76 U. Colo. L. Rev. 327 (2005).
Arguing that, when read in conjunction with the Article I Enclave Clause, “other Property” was understood by the ratifying generation to include land owned by the federal government within a state’s boundaries which did not qualify as an enclave.
-
Peter A. Appel, The Power of Congress “Without Limitation”: The Property Clause and Federal Regulation of Private Property, 86 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (2001).
Documenting that the Property Clause was ratified without much comment, and the scope of power it granted Congress was uncontroversial.
-
Eugene R. Gaetke, Refuting the “Classic” Property Clause Theory, 63 N.C. L. Rev. 617 (1985).
Arguing that early Supreme Court precedent supports a broad construction of the Property Clause.