Hong Kong’s once robust and free-wheeling civil society has been fundamentally reshaped by the 2020 National Security Law, according to this latest GCAL report. Based on dozens of interviews with former civil society activists, most of them now overseas, the report is the first to document the ways in which both the NSL and other legal and extra-legal tools have been used to force the closure of over 100 non-governmental organizations and media outlets.

Protestor running through tear gas.

The Hong Kong government has effectively weaponized its legal system to crack down on participants in the 2019 protests. Our analysis strongly indicates that the government manipulated the criminal justice process to punish protesters, and to deter any future protests.

COVID-19 vaccine bottles

Omicron is not only upending international travel and stock markets, but also underscores the need to expedite vaccination in low-income countries.

Tong Ying-kit arrives at court while press take photos through the car window.

The first-ever verdict under Hong Kong’s 2020 National Security Law does not adhere to international law and comparative best practice, according to an analysis published by Georgetown University Law Center’s Center for Asian Law (GCAL).

A protestor tries to peacefully stop a police vehicle heading to the Legislative Council complex.

The right to a fair trial for National Security Law (NSL) defendants is under threat. NSL defendants have been hampered by restrictions on their core due process rights as the selection process for judges in NSL cases raises concerns about judicial independence.

Photo of a globe showing Asia.

With China emerging as the world’s largest official creditor, its lending program has become the subject of intense international debate. Is China a benevolent development lender — or is it forging a new global empire?

Cover photo of the Hong Kong National Security Law Report: protestors standing in a crowd with face masks and signs

The Center for Asian Law's new report "Hong Kong’s National Security Law: A Human Rights and Rule of Law Analysis," finds that the new law violates both key provisions of the Basic Law and also falls short of international human rights standards.

(Clockwise) Indian Supreme Court Justice Uday Lalit, Dean William M. Treanor and Professor Neal Katyal at the zoom 'Keeping the Executive in Check: The Role of the Judiciary'

Two justices on India’s Supreme Court joined two Georgetown Law professors and Dean William M. Treanor this month for a wide-ranging exploration of the role of the highest courts in the world’s largest democracies.

Dr. Menaka Guruswamy and Arundhati Katju, two top advocates in India’s Supreme Court, spoke to students about the decision that decriminalized adult same-sex contact in that country.

Highlighting a historic human rights decision in India’s Supreme Court, the U.S.-Japan Partnership, foreign policy and much more, the Center for Asian Law is keeping Georgetown informed on important legal developments across the globe.